Skip to content

How do we know? Because IPCC

  • Menu
    • Home
    • Donate (we’re a charity)
    • Follow – Share – Social
    • Praise for Because IPCC
    • Volunteer
    • About
    • Terms of Use – Privacy – Credits – Copyright – Contact
    • Because IPCC is a project of the Canadian charity Succession, charitable number 854745940RR0001

pg9

Seventh online page shows the teacher describing how growing sophistication at the IPCC made each subsequent report more comprehensive but also the time between publications grew. Dialogue: IPCC scientists then needed to prove that the changing climate wasn’t natural, that it was because of human activity As they wrote their second, third, and fourth assessment reports etc. the IPCC included more and more experts from different disciplines. Instead of taking two years, reports were taking four years, six years, eight years to prepare. That’s because the more the IPCC studied climate change, the more they realized it could affect the economy, our health, farming and more. Indigenous experts with traditional knowledge needed to be included. More and more, the social sciences required consideration. Scientists and experts from so many disciplines needed to be included.
7 of 31

Related

October 1, 2020October 29, 2021

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: pg10
Next Next post: pg8

Menu

  • Home
  • Donate (we’re a charity)
  • Follow – Share – Social
  • Praise for Because IPCC
  • Volunteer
  • About
  • Terms of Use – Privacy – Credits – Copyright – Contact
  • Because IPCC is a project of the Canadian charity Succession, charitable number 854745940RR0001
  • Follow Following
    • How do we know? Because IPCC
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • How do we know? Because IPCC
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...